Litigation Lawyer and ADR
Neutral in Pittsburgh, PA
Michael J. Betts is an experienced securities and commercial litigation lawyer in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. For more than forty years, Mr. Betts has represented businesses and individual clients in civil litigation matters in Pittsburgh and Western Pennsylvania. Over his legal career, Mr. Betts has been responsible for handling numerous lawsuits and arbitrations involving a wide range of disputes – including commercial litigation and business disputes, securities and investment-related litigation, including FINRA arbitrations, claims arising from the sale of insurance products and variable annuities, trade secrets and restrictive covenant litigation, and banking litigation.
Mr. Betts also is an experienced alternative dispute resolution (ADR) neutral, frequently serving as a mediator and arbitrator in securities and investment-related cases as well as business disputes. Mr. Betts is on the approved roster of mediators and ADR neutrals for the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. He also has been approved by the Court to serve as an E-Discovery Special Master. Mr. Betts also is on the American Arbitration Association’s national arbitrator panel for commercial and consumer cases, and he is certified by FINRA Dispute Resolution to serve as a mediator and arbitrator in connection with FINRA arbitration cases. For more information about the ADR services provided by Mr. Betts, please visit www.bettsadr.com.
Mr. Betts is a native of Indiana, Pennsylvania. He received his undergraduate degree from Dickinson College and earned his juris doctor degree from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law, where he was on the Law Review. During the initial phase of his legal career, Mr. Betts was a commercial litigation attorney with the law firm of Reed Smith Shaw & McClay, now Reed Smith LLP, and was made a partner of the firm. Following his fourteen years at Reed Smith, Mr. Betts has practiced primarily in a small firm “litigation boutique” environment, and also served as in-house counsel of PNC Bank, N.A., managing litigation. Over his career, Mr. Betts has handled a wide range of litigation matters, including securities litigation and arbitrations, commercial litigation and business disputes, banking litigation, class actions, employment litigation, trade secrets litigation, franchise litigation, insurance coverage litigation and professional negligence, including legal malpractice and accounting malpractice claims. In addition to his litigation practice, Mr. Betts has extensive experience in providing various alternative dispute resolution services, including in mediations, arbitrations, early neutral evaluations and as serving as a Special Master resolving discovery issues. In his role as ADR neutral, Mr. Betts draws on his more than forty years of experience in handling litigation and arbitration matters, and he has been involved in the settlement and resolution of hundreds of cases.
Mr. Betts is admitted to practice before the Supreme Court of the United States, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, and all Courts of Common Pleas throughout the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, as well as other courts.
Mr. Betts represents clients in various types of securities and investment-related matters:
FINRA Securities Arbitrations
Mr. Betts has handled numerous securities and investment-related disputes that are filed with, and administered by, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) and FINRA’s Dispute Resolution Services Forum. FINRA arbitrations can involve either “customer disputes,” which are disputes between brokerage firms and their customers, and “industry disputes,” which involve claims between members of the securities industry, such as claims by one brokerage firm against another firm or claims by a firm against one of its registered representatives, or vice-versa. Most securities-related arbitrations are administered by FINRA, although some arbitrations proceed before other arbitration administrators such as JAMS and the American Arbitration Association.
Securities Litigation – Federal and State Courts
Mr. Betts has extensive experience as a litigator in securities and investment-related cases brought in federal and state courts. Many investment-related disputes are the subject of arbitration proceedings because of arbitration provisions included in account agreements and other contracts governing the relationship of the parties, but many investment-related disputes proceed in the court system rather than in arbitration.
FINRA/SEC Investigations and Enforcement Proceedings
Mr. Betts represents registered representatives in connection with FINRA enforcement proceedings, including investigations, examinations and disciplinary actions. This includes representing brokers in responding to FINRA requests for documents and on-the-record interviews (“OTRs”) during which brokers are required to appear and testify under oath.
FINRA Expungement Proceedings
Mr. Betts represents brokers and financial advisors in connection with expungement proceedings before FINRA. These proceedings arise from negative information reported on uniform registration forms, such as Forms U4 and U5, filed with FINRA’s Central Registration Depository (CRD) system. When such information is inaccurate, it can cause significant harm, as information filed through the CRD system is made available to the public at large through FINRA’s BrokerCheck tool.
Mr. Betts represents clients in various types of commercial litigation matters:
Business Disputes
Mr. Betts has extensive experience in handling a wide range of commercial litigation matters and business disputes, including breach of contract cases, claims arising under the Uniform Commercial Code, shareholder and partnership disputes, trade secret litigation, disputes relating to employee non-compete agreements and business torts, e.g., interference with contractual relations and unfair competition.
Banking Litigation
Through his role as an in-house attorney for a large regional bank and through his private practice, Mr. Betts has substantial experience in handling claims involving banks and other financial institutions, including fiduciary litigation, lender liability claims, account and check fraud cases, and claims arising under Articles 3, 4 and 4A of the Uniform Commercial Code.
Professional Liability Claims
Mr. Betts is experienced in representing clients in professional liability cases, including claims alleging accounting malpractice and legal malpractice.
Trade Secret Litigation
Mr. Betts has substantial experience handling cases involving claims for misappropriation of trade secrets – including proceedings under the federal Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) and the Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secret Act (PUTSA).
United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania Announces Revised ADR Policies and Procedures December 8, 2024 Michael J. Betts The United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania recently announced revised alternative dispute resolution policies and procedures for cases pending before the Court. The Court’s revised Early ADR Policies and Procedures will take effect on January 1, 2025. The... View More →
D.C. Court of Appeals Curtails FINRA’s Unilateral Expulsion Powers, Avoids Addressing Broader Constitutionality Challenges to FINRA December 1, 2024 Michael J. Betts On November 22, 2024, the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued its decision in Alpine Securities Corp. v. Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and discussed, although largely avoided deciding, a host of constitutional challenges to FINRA. The scope of the court’s... View More →
Michael J. Betts LLC Clients Prevail in FINRA Industry Arbitration October 20, 2024 Michael J. Betts On April 4, 2024, a FINRA arbitration panel in the case of Pirchesky, et al. v. Boustead Securities, LLC, et al., FINRA No. 22-01717, awarded damages of more than $200,000, including $125,000 of punitive damages, to clients of Michael J. Betts LLC, who were the claimants in the case. The Panel found... View More →